BP Oil Spill: Well, we could always nuke it closed…

Everybody gets so much information all day long
that they lose their common sense.
~ Gertrude Stein

I haven’t posted anything on the BP oil spill off the Louisiana coast until now because, frankly, I haven’t had much to say about it. Everyone agrees it’s a terrible thing, and lots of people have been jumping up and down on BP with hobnailed boots. The connection to Halliburton – and hence to Cheney and Bush – has come out and been handled in a reasonably satisfactory way. And this disaster seems to have put a halt to President Obama’s plans to increase offshore oil drilling, at least for the time being.

So I haven’t felt like I had much to contribute, and there hasn’t seemed to be any need for increased publicity on the issue. But of course I’ve kept reading as much of the coverage as I could, and this last week, a few items leaped out at me so starkly, that I decided to throw something together. The items that really got my goat were these:

  • The oil spill, already a disaster, is now predicted to be 5 to 12 times worse than initially thought.
  • If efforts to cap the leak are not successful, the spill could continue seriously damaging the Gulf region for decades. We may be dealing with the consequences for the rest of the 21st century.
  • The companies ignored safety problems, and the government agencies concerned did not exercise proper oversight.
  • BP makes enough profit in 4 days to cover the cost of cleaning up this spill.
  • The BP CEO says the spill is ‘relatively tiny’ compared with the ‘very big ocean’.

For links to these items, and a round up of other links and ledges on the most interesting and or damning articles on the oil spill from the last week, see below…

The Seattle Times: BP oil spill disaster – photos.

Gulf Coast oil spill map – requires Google Earth.

BP Oil Spill 2010: Latest News, PHOTOS: “The BP oil spill has had devastating effects to the environment as well as humans and wildlife in the Gulf region.”

Video: Oil has reached Louisiana coast, says marine biologist.

U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits: “The federal Minerals Management Service gave permission to dozens of oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first getting required permits from another agency.”

Firms ignored warning over oil leak: “Documents suggest BP, Transocean and Halliburton ignored tests indicating faulty safety equipment, says committee”

My job is at risk, admits BP boss: “Tony Hayward, the beleaguered chief executive of BP, has claimed its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is ‘relatively tiny’ compared with the ‘very big ocean’.”

Oil leak ‘may be 12 times BP estimate’: “One analysis suggests gusher is 70,000 barrels daily, or an Exxon Valdez every four days, and 12 times more powerful than estimates by Coast Guard or BP”

Gulf Oil Leaks Could Gush for Years: “If efforts fail to cap the seafloor leaks, the continuous seep of oil could poison the Gulf’s coastal habitats for decades, experts say.”

Oil blowout device ‘was faulty’: “Congressional investigators say the device meant to halt an oil leak after the Gulf of Mexico rig blast was faulty.”

Probe Finds Lots of Problems At Oil Rig: “Bad wiring and a leak in what’s supposed to be a ‘blowout preventer.’ Sealing problems that may have allowed a methane eruption. Even a dead battery, of all things.”

As Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Spreads, BP, Halliburton and Transocean Executives Deflect Blame for Spill at Senate Hearings: “As thousands of gallons of oil continue to spew daily from a damaged well in the Gulf of Mexico, representatives from BP, Transocean and Halliburton were grilled by lawmakers in back-to-back hearings on Capitol Hill Tuesday. Industry executives from all three corporations began with prepared testimony that involved blaming each other for the explosion and deflecting responsibility for the unfolding environmental and economic disaster.”

Angry Obama denounces oil companies’ ‘ridiculous spectacle’: “A visibly angered President Barack Obama hit out at oil companies Friday for trying to avoid blame over a massive slick, and vowed an all-out effort to stop the leak pouring into the Gulf of Mexico.”

The Gulf of Mexico spill: a new call to action?: “We may well be living with the consequences of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill for the rest of the 21st century.”

Time for BP to stop blame game | Jules Boykoff: “As the ruptured BP well relentlessly haemorrhages oil into the Gulf of Mexico, experts now predict that by mid-June, the spill will exceed the amount the Exxon Valdez unleashed on Prince William Sound in 1989 when it dumped 10.9 million gallons of Prudhoe Bay crude into Alaskan waters, the biggest spill in US history.”

Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers at Hearings on Drilling: “As the Congressional hearings into offshore drilling began in Washington, a more intimate inquiry into what went wrong three weeks ago on the fallen Deepwater Horizon drilling rig began in this suburb of New Orleans, with members of the Coast Guard and the Minerals Management Service demanding answers — often from within their own agencies.”

Well, we could always nuke it closed…: “TrueSlant translates best-selling Russian newspaper Komsomoloskaya Pravda as they remind us that back in the Soviet era they used nuclear blasts to seal off oil leaks much like the one currently making a mess of the Gulf of Mexico [via SlashDot]. Five times, in fact… and only one of those five attempts failed”

UPDATE: For why this is a bad idea, see BP Oil Spill: Why we can’t nuke it closed…

BP makes enough profit in 4 days to cover costs of cleanup: “BP said yesterday that it had already spent $350 million on the spill response, and the company’s stock has taken a big hit, but the ‘behemoth’ company will almost certainly survive the disaster with little long term damage. BP’s daily profits dwarf the daily cost of spill response: the company could cover the entire cost in just four days.”

Gulf oil spill: quick fix dashed as BP tower fails to contain oil: “Hopes of a quick fix to stop oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil rig gushing into the Gulf of Mexico were dashed on Saturday, when a build-up of crystallised gas blocked the pipes in the huge metal containment tower, which then had to be lifted from the seabed.”

BP Sees Hope for Solution in Capping Spill in the Gulf: “Officials said Wednesday that new plans involving work on a safety device called a blowout preventer could move them closer to halting the oil spill.”

BP continues hunt to stop Gulf of Mexico oil spill: “With no clear sign of an early fix, authorities were stepping up their efforts to keep the oil from making landfall.”

BP’s solution for the spill, chemical dispersants, may make things worse: “Are the chemical dispersants BP’s using in the Gulf oil spill a cosmetic solution?”

From the “lest we forget” file: Justice Department Targets BP Over Massive 2006 Oil Spill: “The Justice Department recently filed a civil suit against BP’s Alaska unit over two massive oil spills in Prudhoe Bay three years ago.”

And finally, in the “every oil spill has a silver lining” category: Gulf of Mexico disaster: Oil and vinegar: “The Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion that killed 11 workers on 20 April has the potential to transform the face of oil exploration.”

Last word to our best political commentator: Jon Stewart On Gulf Cleanup Efforts (VIDEO): ‘We’re All Going To Die!’.

(What does it say about the state of our public sphere that some of the best political commentary and hardest hitting interviews with public figures appear on a satire show on “Comedy Central”?)

Advertisements

6 responses to “BP Oil Spill: Well, we could always nuke it closed…

  1. why not inflate a specialey made balloon
    in the leak then cap it??? simple

    Like

  2. H. Peter Klobes

    The BP CEO says the spill is ‘relatively tiny’ compared with the ‘very big ocean’.

    You pal, are a real stupid goof!!!

    Like

  3. Let the Navy disarm a laser guided missal or rocket into the whole of the well. If one does not work, keep firing till it dose. Perhaps the direct impact to the pipe and the surrounding area will result in a stop of the oil flow.

    Like

  4. Re Using nuclear weapons or other weapons on the spill.

    Though the idea has some appeal, the use of nuclear weapons has not worked as well as some would have us believe. E.g. one of the weapons caused fractures, and a permanent seepage now exists in one of the wells that Russia tried to fix.

    Time for cool heads, not knee jerk reactions. At this time, no one knows the cause of the blow out, and perhaps no one will ever know, as several things could have happened well beyond the obvious such as a BOP failure. For five hours prior to the blowout TransOcean experienced erratic pressure readings perhaps because of faulty equipment, a fractured casing, or light hydrocarbons undergoing phase changes because of the high pressure and cooling in the riser pipes.

    Like

  5. I hope this doesn’t cause some sort of massive tidal wave, or tsunami….This just doesn’t sound like a good idea….But who knows im no Physicist….But im getting conflicts from my 9th grade physical science logic…. :o/

    Like

  6. I’m pretty sure the reason for not nuking it could be the fact that it’s on a large methane deposit. Now assuming the methane deposit does not rupture on it’s own first ( evidently there has been signs it has ) which will cause a poisonous gas to kill everything it touches, but the explosion will send a tsunami like wave hurling at the shores of the US … which will result in something similar to the 2004 Tsunami except, y’know, on American shores.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s